So I've been thinking, 'What If' I never headed over to the Punchi Theatre on Saturday?
What if, indeed. I'd have had several better things to do, I tell you.
They promised us a slightly pseudo-intellectual, psychological, soul searching experience and good Lord, they had an abundance of vacuous adjectives to describe it in their publicity campaign. But honestly, what was the point of all that drivel if it didn't break some new ground, as extensively promised? What we saw was a bunch of adoloscent smartypants doing their best to make a claim for adulthood by declaring a new level of insight into the psychology of relationships. Balls.
So maybe I sound like a full blown bitch. Granted. What can I say? When the buttons get pushed...
To clarify here, don't get me wrong- I do have good things to say. In an everyday, realistic way the script was well written. It was fairly natural, and as a result, convincing. For the most part it was pleasantly minimalistic and believable- as was the acting at times. Until of course, the lecturing set in. Strange. At 22 years, I am no spring chicken darlings, but I know well enough to know that the adoloscent (for whom the play seemed to have been written) don't appreciate sermonizing, thank you very much, goodbye. Yet young Wasaam Ismail appeared to revel in the ernest preaching a leeetle too much, me thinks. The lady in the psycho-analyst cum matron of purgatory role regurgitated a just a TAD too much hackneyed psychology on relationships. Being in love and loving someone are two very different things-duuuh, newsflash, ding ding ding. If you promise to tell us something we didn't know already or pull us out of our collective comfort zones, tell us something new, por favor.
The acting. Granted, in terms of well rounded characters...lets not go there. But that shouldn't matter, considering the apparent purpose of the play and the subject matter. But geez, don't give us ham and (I overheard this comment and just learnt what it meant :) ) 'polkudu accents'.
There isn't too much else to say, really. Despite the pitfalls, respect to the director/writer for making the attempt. For making a start. Wasaam Ismail is as I said a bit of an adoloscent smartypants but there is some amazing potential there as long as he doesn't fall into the trap of striving to be over-creative.
The creativity part of things was fairly clear- I loved the soundtrack, there were a lot of contemporary, relevant, mood setting and mature choices there. The production was theatrical eye candy- no distracting shifting of sets and dragging of wood on wood, no long blackouts. There was professional simplicity the multi-purpose platforms and the lighting was used to good effect in indicating the emotions of the scenes.
And there we have it. Yes, I was disappointed but there were positives. Hopefully I've redeemed my inherrently bitchy nature :)
Whoops. A boo boo in the opening sentence. Friday- opening night of What If.
ReplyDeleteAnd why did they have to make out for real?
ReplyDeleteSick. He decides to write a play about his own relationship, lie about it and then stuff his tongue down some poor girl's throat. That was just so unnecessary.
The girl's acting was good though
What if I spent my Rs. 550 on something else?
ReplyDeleteWhat a rip off. An indulgent, preachy, stomach-turning load of crap, in my opinion. After holding a candle- or rather many candles to his proclaimed flair for writing and claiming to offer relationship guidance to confused victims of failed relationships, all that was done was to malign his ex-girlfriend in a grotesque smooch fest. Apparently the story was based on several relationships. Who is he kidding? The audience is not as naive and gullible as Wasaam Ismail would like to think, thank you very much.
Seriously, he looked like he had a serious problem with lice, and looked distinctly like some sort of myopic goldfish in the sordid make-out scenes.
The only redeeming factor was the look and sound of the production.It rendered a professional touch to an otherwise amateurish production.
It wasnt thaaat bad...for me it made me think and it showedt that sometimes you dont realize that you are also to blame for stuff like its a two way thing. And I thought the acting was good like the way he had to switch from scene to scene...
ReplyDeleteTush. You lot are a bunch of plebs. One day, not unlike Vincent Van Gogh, Wasaam Ismail's theatrical genius will be hailed as once misunderstood but subsequently appreciated as comparable with the likes of all our classical, theatrical and literary greats for his bold statements, shockingly revolutionary thinking and smooth making out technique.
ReplyDeleteOr maybe not.
Afternoon all!
ReplyDeleteSo, the play was based on his relationship, heh? Well, we all know what they say about men who kiss and tell.
Yes, the girl's acting was pretty decent. Unfortunately, the writer was so engrossed in Matt that he seems to have forgotten that all this emotional claptrap doesn't apply only to poor ickle Matt but Rachel as well. Why wasn't her character brought out more? If what you guys say is true and the play is based on a true story, that's ugly. Nasty.
Gigglepuss, Myopic Goldfish! :D
Anonymous, you're right about the switching of emotions but don't you think the conversations with the shrink were over-acted?
Opera Ghost, I believe I have found a kindred spirit!
Agreed! The lighting was professional and used to good effect in indicating the emotions of the scenes and creative at the same time. The music was good but too much at times. Acting not up-to mark.
ReplyDeleteI guess it takes someone who has gone through a pad patch to really appreciate the play. It may have had minor flaws but It made me go home and realize what I've been doing in my relationship.
ReplyDeleteI thought the script was brilliant and it made me personally understand a lot of things about how either party thinks in a relationship.
I don't know about you guys but I loved the portrayal of Matt. Especially how he sustained his emotions right throughout and yet managed to switch to the other scenes that didnt need so much emotion. Hats off for that! He seemed to be acting as a looony with the therapist but then I realized that a massive heartbreak can really drive you to the point of being mad.
The stuff the therapist said were very very true, though i thought she could have played her role better. Playing so many scenes are not easy but I think it the direction, the lighting and music really brought it to life!
Overall I thought it was an evening well spent.
I don't know... if it is really about his ex-girlfriend then I must say it was a very brave move.
ReplyDeleteIt takes a lot of guts to put everything out there.
I mean even though it didn't focus a lot on the girl the guy confessed a lot of bad things about himself, and made the audience realize what his emotions were about, so i don;t think the intention was to really malign his ex-girlfriend. and the acting wasn't bad. I guess the only reason this has been talked a lot is because its a topic that hasn't been put out there much and was done unconventionally, beyond the usual social norms.
again, very brave.
I guess it takes people like wassam to make a difference.
The play affected me deeply. I went home and wept...for the 550 bucks wasted on a ticket.
ReplyDeleteWithout going as far as to say What If pure unadulterated crap, or as far to say that it was literary/ dramatic blueberry cheesecake, lets take the middle road here.
ReplyDeleteThe play was purportedly for mature audiences, but leave aside the excessive making out and profane language, and it was something that several adolescents and kids barely out of their teens could relate to. Which is why some of you here appreciated the ideas brought forward. For fear of sounding like a condescending prick (which is not my intention but there it is) for people who have not had much experience of relationships, I would suppose it was reasonably insightful. That young couples experience insecurities and uncertainty is an accepted fact. Added to that, the drama did point out that in this situation both parties share a reluctance to venture into certain areas and really delve into the problem.
This is natural enough, though maybe not exactly the right thing do. Yet the fact that it happens was fairly well highlighted but not sufficiently to make the content 'uncomfortably real'.
I agree with the lost queen in saying that the role of the arbitrator was not put to effective use in really providing NEW insights. Look around a bit, read a little more, watch a few of the better movies (for god's sake not bilge like Twilight) and you will realize that these so called new ideas are in fact ones which have been spoken of for years. And not just in the 20th-21st centuries. Even 18th-19th century novelists realized these facts and included them in their work. Despite the fact that relationships moved differently then, the emotional issues were the same. Young men did have insecurities and a fear of early commitment; young women did not know how to come to come to terms with this. Feelings of rejection, betrayal, uncertainty and everything declared to be highlighted in What If were all too common even then. Why? Because in essence, human beings have not changed.
Considering this is his first script, Wasaam should by rights be commended for making the attempt. But he has only scratched the surface.
Continued...
ReplyDeleteAnonymous, having been through a bad patch myself and helped several friends through their own, I can tell you that there is far more to failed relationships than this. But for your sake I am glad What If helped you in some way. A word of advice though. Don't apply everything you saw to every situation or things could go seriously wrong.
Which brings me to my next point.
Unwittingly (maybe), Wasaam created the impression in his writing that in the event of facing the same level of insecurity, and the need to 'explore', the act of giving in to the urge helps one learn and grow. To an impressionable audience such as this, such a statement could very well be translated into a condoning of the act of sleeping around in order to come to the realization of exactly what one wants. It does not work that way. Dangerously, some audience members caught up in this little aha moment may forget the passing remark made by Matt that though it felt good it didn't mean anything. Which means that though Matt reached a level of understanding, this is neither the right thing to do nor is it an effective course of action.
Alice in Wonderland, come out of wonderland. Wasaam has not made a difference. Not yet anyway. This one play will not cut it. To really make a difference or at least take baby steps in the right direction he would have to delve deeper- which I hope he does. I will definitely come to watch the attempt.
As for the acting, even though it is possible for someone undergoing that level of suffering to come across as half mad, I don't think Wasaam's portrayal was entirely convincing. As for the girl, hers was slightly better but I'm not sure she had really tapped into he potential. The kissing was unnecessarily dwelt on- it smacked too hard of a young director trying his best to be a little different. It didn't add anything to the play; neither did shock us or make us think that we were seeing anything 'out there' or realistic, or whatever.
As for the alleged attempt to put Wasaam's past relationship in the spotlight, I cant say it is a brave move. Rather I would say it is bold. Presumptuous. Cheeky. And not in a good way. Why? Because humans are too complex to be analyzed in that way and he is presumptuous in thinking that he had his ex-girlfriend all figured out. Added to which the story of the relationship and break up were (in some places) accurate to what really happened.
Whether some other gory details were doctored, I cant say. But from what I remember of the incident as it unfolded, a rather unfair picture was painted of the girl. She is in real life a very pleasant,kind and unassuming person and wherever she may or may not have gone wrong in the relationship, she does not deserve to have an experience which brought her a great deal of pain for a long long time, nit picked, discussed and speculated on in this way.
Which is why Wasaam should have been a little more sensitive and not drawn such direct allusions to his past relationship and as proclaimed, brought in fragments of stories from other relationships. That way, the whole thing would have been even more comprehensive and insightful.
Whoooo this guy is getting lots and lots of publicity! Ha Ha! So what! He kissed! So what! he made a play about his ex/ or possibly drew inspiration out of it! So What! He made a brave move, or bold as someone called it! BIG EFFING DEAL! GET OVER IT! Can you do it? I don’t think so!
ReplyDeleteI have no effing big ass relationship issue and I have nothing against the play (I thought it was quite cool unlike… – beside the point) but I think Mr. Ismail went out there and achieved his objective. He made an impression. He created a stir. He made people think. He made people debate it, argue about it and most importantly, he made money out of it! This blog post is proof! HA HA
WTF, maybe you should write a play called 'So What!' :P
ReplyDeleteAs i walked in to the Punchi theatre - i saw those weird looking balloon headed a-hole puppets which depicted Wasaam Ismail from top to bottom with words like "Rejection" - Wasaam Ismail always dealt with rejection - from school days - by his classmates - his batchmates - his SO called friends and finally his girlfriend. Why? because in short he's an a**hole - no one likes him - probably the only person who liked him or loved him for that matter was his EX Girlfriend. Im not going to mention names - but for people who felt sad for Matt - know this - he cheated on her, he wanted a break , he f***** his life up because he was bored with her - while he was doing this shit - she still went back to him, she kept on trying to get back with him even after he treated her like shit.
ReplyDeleteonce she accepted that it was pointless and it was time to move on with life - this a**hole AKA Wasaam Ismail decided that he wanted her back - and as for you who watched the play - the last bit you watched where she says YES to the new guy(BTW is an absolute gem in comparison to this A**hole)on the same day they slept together - THAT NEVER HAPPENED!! He's a f****** liar!!
I pity those people who said anything good about this play - because clearly you haven't witnessed good theatre in Sri Lanka :)
Wasaam Ismail- exposed. Reality Tv-esque. Tee hee hee ;)
ReplyDeleteSomeone should have brought pins that day noh :Pmwahahahaha
ReplyDeleteTHUS i prove my point again! If only I could get half as much as attention this guy is getting HA HA
ReplyDeletePOP! - good one! sneak sneak
Whatifitwasactuallyagoodplay.... The play wasn't super fabulously GREAAAAAAAAAAAT. but still I thought it was good and I don't regret spending time and money on it.
But is it just me or do I sense some JEALOUSY as Mr. Ismail so boldly, (or was it bravely? ha ha) put out there on stage?
Some of the comments up there makes me feel that people are really intimidated by this guy!
On a serious note! Whatifitwasactuallyagoodpla I think thats just a load of envious crap. If this guy is not that liked as you say, and if he does face so much rejection from everybody, how does he end up pulling off a big ass production?
Aha!!
And what proof is it that its about his own life? If I go out there and write something about sexual child abuse would that mean I was fu**ed in the ass when I was a kid?
Big load of Bulls crap if you ask me!
Alright I'm not looking for an argument! :-D
Well said, Wasaam. You um, really know how to put forward your case in a subtle manner.
ReplyDeletehttp://sharanya-sekaram.blogspot.com/2011/12/what-if-it-didnt-stir-up-this-much.html
ReplyDeleteA response to you all :)
Greetings all, and sorry for the silence. And, before I get into them, thank you for the comments:)
ReplyDeleteSo some of you liked the play and others didn't; that's perfectly natural. Sniggers and 'POP!' thank you for keeping ze mood light:) considering the sentiments of some here, I'd say that was needed.
Which brings me to 'Whatifitwasactuallyagoodplay'. Freedom of speech and all of that granted, lets have less of the personal digs, please. I appreciate your comment, your apparent honesty; and I'm sure some people would have even found it amusing but lets not get too nasty, thank you. As a policy, I don't moderate comments because of the freedom of speech I mentioned earlier. However, I will not entertain slander after this post. Negative comments on the work of the dramatist are acceptable as you are entitled to your own opinion, but deliberate insults will no longer be permitted.
Steady, steady. Thank you for that detailed and balanced comment. Thanks too, to Shara for her blog post. I would suggest that you lot check it out- a balanced review.
WTF, I have to say, your comments are, in a word, amusing and erm, revealing :)
This whole play was gross and what was with the slutty attire of the lead actress? i mean she was literally pulling down her dress in front of everyone, she was clearly not confident in what she was wearing or her role and could anyone blame her?
ReplyDeletealso that crazy pycho therapist! what was that about? how little did wasaam respect his audience to think that we could'nt figure out all that for ourselves?
i agree the music was great, but at the end of the day a couple of rich kids using their daddy's money to put together a play so they can feel important is hardly theater and a advertising campaign utilizing the minuscule skills they learned at the Academy of Design does not make a great production. Furthermore it is an insult to all those thespians in this country who work hard at their craft.
also if any of you thought there was anything new in this play or you could "relate to it", you are better off watching Dawson's Creek, this is pretty much that, scene for scene. at least that show has some complex vocabulary!